Popular Posts

Thursday, March 31, 2011

THE PAKISTANI TRADITION OF APPEASEMENT ,OPPORTUNISM , DOCILITY AND SYCOPHANCY


IT WOULD NOT BE WRONG TO DESCRIBE PAKISTAN AS THE CITADEL OF APPEASEMENT ,OPPORTUNISM , DOCILITY AND SYCOPHANCY.

THIS IS PAKISTANS UNIQUE CHARACTER !

ITS GENERALS CANNOT ACHIEVE A BREAKTHROUGH AT KHEM KARAN EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE A SUPERIORITY OVER SEVEN TO ONE IN TANKS ! ITS MILITARY INTELLIGENCE FAILS TO LOCATE AN INDIAN TANK DIVISION WHICH HAS A HEAD TO TAIL LENGTH OF AT LEAST A 100 MILES WHEN MOVING ON A SINGLE ROAD ! ITS JUDGES HAVESHAMELESSLY VALIDATED ILLEGITIMATE MILITARY TAKE OVERS REPEATEDLY AND THIS INCLUDES ITS PRESENT SUPREME COURT WHO SHAMELESSLY COLLABORATED WITH PAKISTANI MILITARY AND GAVE A CLEAN CHIT TO THE ILLEGITIMATE MILITARY USURPER MUSHARRAF IN 1999-2000.

NOW THOSE WHO TRIED TO KILL MUSHARRAF WERE ACTUALLY TRYING TO KILL A TRAITOR WHO HAD USURPED POWER ! A MAN WHO HAD COMMITTED HIGH TREASON ! AND INSTEAD OF APPRECIATING THESE HEROES WHO HAD MORE GUTS AND WERE MORE INTELLECTUALLY HONEST THAN ANY PAKISTANI JUDGE THE SUPREME COURTS DISMISSES THEIR  PEOPLE !

I DONT THINK A COUNTRY WHERE COURTS COLLABORATE WITH THOSE WHO HAVE POWER AND SENTENCE THOSE WHO  FOUGHT AGAINST TYRANNY DESERVE TO EXIST !

PAKISTANS JUDGE ARE SHIT SCARED OF THE MILITARY !

PAKISTAN HAS A STONE AGE LAW  DENYING BASIC RIGHTS TO MILITARY PERSONNEL AND UNLIKE INDIA WHERE MILITARY PERSONNEL HAVE RIGHTS TO GO TO CIVIL COURT WHILE STILL IN UNIFORM ,PAKISTAN HAS NO SUCH RIGHTS ! ITS A STONE  AGE COUNTRY NO DOUBT ! A COUNTRY WHERE INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY IS REWARDED AND THOSE WHO DEFY USUPERS SENTENCED TO DEATH !

WHAT AN ABSOLUTE SHAME !

AGHA.H.AMIN


ISLAMABAD - The Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed a review petition filed by those convicted in the Pervez Musharraf attack case and upheld the Lahore High Court (LHC)'s decision. A three-member SC bench headed by Chief Justice (CJ) Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry took up the petition for hearing on Thursday. Lawyer Hashmat Habib appeared on behalf of the two accused, Aamir Sohail and Rana Naveed, who were both given life sentences by the LHC, while lawyer Col (r) Akram represented the rest of the accused. 
Akram told the court about the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC)'s decision and the appeal filed in the LHC in the case. He requested the court to review the sentence awarded to the accused. Twelve of the accused were given death sentences, one was sentenced to 10 years in prison and Sohail and Naveed were given life sentences. The CJ said the bench was not hearing the appeal plea and if the counsels though there were any points that could be reviewed, then they should bring it to the court, a comment to which Akram could not reply. 
Habib told the court that the ATC had sentenced his clients to 20 years in prison each and an appeal had been filed against the decision in the LHC, which the high court had dismissed.

Jimmy Carter Meets Fidel Castro

From: Red Ant Liberation Army News <no-reply@wordpress.com>
Subject: [New post] Interview with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter in Havana, Cuba
To: mark_j8888@yahoo.co.in
Date: Friday, 1 April, 2011, 7:33 AM

Interview with former U.S. President Jimmy Carter in Havana, Cuba

BJ Murphy | March 31, 2011 at 10:03 pm | Categories: Cuba, History, Political Figures, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pUZCt-1Rn

By: Arleen Rodríguez Derivet
March 31, 2011

James Carter in Havana. Photo: Alex Castro

Arleen Rodríguez: Hello! A greeting to all of those who are watching Cuban Television right now. I welcome all of you, along with the former President of the United States, James Carter, who just moments before leaving to return to his country has graciously agreed to give us an interview, and an exclusive statement for our television broadcast.

Welcome. Thank you for accepting our invitation.

Jimmy Carter: It's a great pleasure to return to Cuba, to Havana.

Rodríguez: It's a great pleasure to have you here as well. You told me that you'd like to say something to the Cuban people before our interview.

Carter: Yes.

Rodríguez: The camera is yours.

Carter: To the people of Cuba I would like to say that I am very grateful for the chance to return to your wonderful country once again. My wife and I enjoy being here with the Cuban people, to meet with the government leaders, to meet with some of those Cuban citizens who disagree with the government. We met with all of them. We are very excited about the prospects for the upcoming Congress that will begin next month. We also had a chance to meet with the parents of the so-called Cuban Five, with two of the mothers and also with the wives.

My hope is that in the future we will see normalization of relations between Cuba and the United States. I would like to see at the time all the restraints on travel from the United States to Cuba and Cuba to the United States lifted, and also have freedoms in both our countries, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, freedom to travel as you wish, these are very important for the entire world and for the people of Cuba.

We had meetings with the foreign minister, with the President of the National Assembly, with President Castro, with the former President, Fidel Castro, an old friend of mine, to learn all we can about the economic changes in Cuba.

This morning I was also able to meet with Mr. Gross, who has been sentenced to a long term in prison in Cuba, and we believe he is innocent of any crime. I hope in the future we'll see his freedom along with the freedom of the so-called Cuban Five who have now spent 12 years in prison in the United States.

In the future I hope that we can see unimpeded trade and commerce as well as travel back and forth between our two countries and I'd like to see the economic embargo lifted completely…it doesn't just affect the government but it hurts the people. My views on the Cuban American relationship are that it needs to change.

When I became president I immediately lifted the travel restraints between both my country and Cuba and I have worked very closely with your former President Fidel Castro to establish diplomatic exchange through Interests Sections. Now the United States and Cuba have about 300 people employed in the Interests Sections, both in the United States as well as in Cuba, and there are Cubans who work in the Interests Section in Cuba and vice-versa, and I think that this can contribute to normal diplomatic relations between the two countries.

This has been a good opportunity that I've been given by Cuban TV to address you and say how marvelous your country is.

Rodríguez: Thanks.

I'd like to take advantage of this opportunity to ask you a few questions.

First of all, I'd like to congratulate you for the respect and sympathy that you've generated as the only U.S. President in 50 years to do something to normalize relations. You recalled some of the important steps. Also for the fact that you have come to Cuba twice already, and for doing so with your hand extended and with respect. The Cuban people, who have a lot of pride and dignity, receive such visitors sympathetically.

I believe that, getting down to the substance of this interview, you've relieved me of having to do an introduction, by expressing once again your desire and willingness for the blockade against Cuba to be lifted. It's known that there's a majority consensus in U.S. society on this, even among the Cuban community in the United States, and that, furthermore, the international community has overwhelmingly demanded this for the last twenty years, the same way that its efforts are supported by a vast majority in Cuba and the United States.

As you yourself acknowledge, the blockade remains in place, and the Cuban people know, furthermore, that it remains in place as stiffly as ever, sometimes even more rigorous than before.

I ask: What prospects do you see for relations between Cuba and the United States and for this blockade, that the whole world opposes?

Carter: As you know, the majority of Cubans want to have normal relations with the United States, and the overwhelming majority of North Americans also want to have normal relationships with Cuba. Unfortunately there are a few radical leaders in my country, some in prominent positions in Congress, mostly Cuban Americans, who insist on keeping the relationship between our two countries separate, these representatives of the old Cuban American community, whose main goal was to overthrow the Castro regime; even among the Cuban Americans now in my country they are a small minority now, but they're very powerful, in our political circles. I believe that in the last few years, I've seen public opinion polls even inside Miami … testifying that the younger members of that community want to move the economic blockade against Cuba and want to have normal opportunities to travel in both directions: from the United States to Cuba and also from Cuba to the United States. This is a change. In my opinion, it's a change that is going to continue into the future and I hope that my small voice, and the opinion of many American, can make this a reality.

Rodríguez: Mr. Carter, I was very moved as I listened to you in the press conference, and here in your statement, when I heard you also ask for, demand, freedom for the Five Cuban Heroes imprisoned in the States, who Cuba considers heroes, because they faced terrorist groups and were able to prevent the list of 2,099 wounded and 3,478 dead from terrorist attacks on our country from growing any larger.

I don't know how aware you are of how deeply the Cuban people feel about the demand that the Five be released. However, I didn't hear you say they should be pardoned.

You said that according to U.S. law you expected that they would be freed. They have appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear their case, despite the fact that more than 10 Nobel laureates and hundreds of political personalities and intellectuals around the world had demanded it. In other words, all the legal steps have been exhausted.

The process has been extremely arbitrary, as you said, judges have acknowledged this, and two of them have been subjected to the additional punishment of being denied regular visits from their wives, as well as having the visits from their family members made very difficult.

To arrive at this point with the Supreme Court and not allow even for the review of such a complex case is what made these Nobel prizewinners and political personalities demand that Obama grant a pardon.

You were the President of the United States. You exercised the right to pardon, as a humanitarian gesture, that I tell you – as a Cuban – the Cuban people would deeply appreciate a pardon. Are you inclined to add your name to the other Nobel prizewinners who are asking Obama to pardon the Five?

Carter: As you know, I'm not only a former president, but I'm also a Nobel laureate.

Rodríguez: That's why.

Carter: Well, in my private talks to President Bush and also with President Obama, I have urged the release of these prisoners.

I recognize the restraints within the American judicial system, and my hope is that the president might grant a pardon, but you have to realize that this is a decision that could only be made by the president himself, it would be presumptuous of me to try to tell another president what to do; but the presidents, now and before this, have known that my own opinion is that the original trial of the Cuban Five was very doubtful, it violated standards, and also some of the restraints on their visitation were extreme.

Now I know that all of the people have been able to visit them in jail, and it is my wish in the future that before a pardon might be granted is that there could be more access by these families to these prisoners .

I have been informed by officials, for instance, that the shooting down of the small planes over Havana, that caused the death of two pilots, was done after the President of the United States informed Cuban leaders that no more flights would take place. And I was informed by Cuban officials that they notified the President of the United States, very clearly, that they could not permit a plane to fly over their capital city…dropping leaflets…but that they would protect the sovereignty of Cuba. So even those more serious, allegations, in my opinion are very doubtful, about their need or cause of the extensive sentences that have been granted to one of the prisoners; but in every way, in my private report with Obama when I return to the United States, in my public statements like today, in my previous conversations with American leaders, I've called for the release of the Cuban Five. One of the reasons is that, guilty or not, is they've served a long prison sentence already, more than 12 years, and the fact that they've been punished adequately, even if they are guilty.

Rodríguez: Recently a person very closely connected to the case, who you knew very well, Leonard Weinglass, passed away. I know that you know he was a man with a love for justice, who fought for justice, and his last words, his last work, even, on his deathbed, was to prove that the Five had nothing to do with the downing of the planes.

Carter: Yes, I know.

Rodríguez: To go further into the case would make this conversation much longer, but what the Cuban people know, what can be proven, what is known, even by U.S. authorities, through the reports that Cuba sent, is that the only thing these young people were doing was looking for information to prevent terrorist actions.

I am confident that you will be able to convey the insistence on a pardon, as a humanitarian gesture. These men have suffered a lot, and have lost family members without being able to be at their side; finally, I don't insist, I thank you for your interest and your statements in the name of the Cuban people.

Mr. Carter, you also said this morning at the press conference that you had a friendly meeting with Comandante Fidel Castro, who has expressed in his Reflections a great deal of anguish about the risks faced by the human species, about the huge nuclear arsenals that keep on growing and that are capable of destroying the world several times over, and also about the nefarious consequences that climate change might have for the human species. These are subjects in which I believe you have broad agreement.

As a nuclear physicist, you know what nuclear weapons mean for the human species, when you were President, you worked hard to educate your people against consumer culture, promoted rational policies, defended the environment, even though it made you unpopular among certain sectors.

Well, quickly, I'd like to know if you still think there is a chance to do something to save humankind.

Carter: Well, when I was president, we negotiated with the Soviet Union to reduce the level of nuclear weapons, through the so-called SALT II Treaty, and since then I've been a strong advocate of reducing productions in nuclear arsenals on both sides. Also I believe very strongly that there is a real threat to the wellbeing of all human beings through global warming, and as you probably know, President Obama and his predecessor, President Bush, attempted to work with other nuclear powers on reducing arsenals, and that they have been monitoring very closely the agreements that have been signed by these governments.

I think the United States has not been adequately strong in its potential leadership in addressing the global warming issue. Cuban officials, since I've been here, have pointed out me that the old city in Havana is in danger of destruction… I have been to Bolivia to meet with Evo Morales, and maybe Bolivia will be the first country that will have major damage to its economy, because the glaciers in the mountains of Bolivia are melting…their source of drinking water. So I'm hoping that in the future, this issue, and the global warming issue, can be addressed by my country and all nations, and I know that Fidel Castro is addressing this now, at least in his Reflections. I talked to him about inviting … more definitively about his actions at present, as related to the United States … what goes on in current affairs, and he wants to use his voice as a senior statesman for the wellbeing of all humankind. We've had good conversations, we basically agree on many things, and above all, we also talked about global warming, and I believe that there might be a possibility between our two countries. Now I'm afraid I have to leave, to get on my airplane, I don't have an Air Force One any more.

Rodríguez: I'm very grateful for your time. Thank you. Every time you come to Cuba, hope is awakened, although the blockade continues to make relations so difficult.

Carter: Espero que podemos volver otra vez, muchas veces. En la oportunidad traer toda mi familia. Hay muchos de nuestra familia. Tenemos treinta y seis miembros… [I hope that we can return again, many times. I'd like to bring all my family. There are a lot of us. We have thirty-six members...] grandchildren, great grandchildren, spouses, children, we'd like to have all of us come to Cuba.

Thank you very much.

Rodríguez: Thank you, Mr. Carter, very much.

James Carter visit Fidel Castro in Havana. Photo: Alex Castro

Carter, his wife Rosalynn and Fidel in Havana. Photo: Alex Castro

James Carter during an interview with Arleen Rodríguez. Photo: Jenny Muñoa

Source

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Indian Army Criticized Over 'illegal' golf courses

AT LEAST INDIA HAS THE FREEDOM OF CRITICISM

NO ONEI IN PAKISTAN DARES TO TALK ABOUT PAKISTANI MILITARYS MORE THAN 35 GOLF COURSES.

INDIAN GENERALS ARETAKEN TO COURT ON CORRUPTION.

IN PAKISTAN THE SUPREME COURT DARES NOT COME NEAR ANY MAJOR MILITARY CORRUPTION CASE.

AGHA.H AMIN

--------------------------------------------------


All that glitters from a distance may not be gold most of the time.
 
 
K. Bajwa


Request:
Before forwarding this e-mail, as a courtesy, respect others privacy & delete all email addresses.  Using BCC to address also helps guard privacy. Erasing the history also helps prevent Spammers from mining addresses and viruses from being propagated. Thank You.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
 
 

Army golf course in IndiaThe Army Zone Golf website shows players in action

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

 
 

India's national auditor and PAC has criticized the armed forces for illegally running nearly 100 golf courses and sports clubs on government land.

It says that the military is the country's largest land owner and has 97 courses, covering at least 8,000 acres.

But it says they should not have been built in the first place, as golf is not an authorized military activity.

An army spokesman said the report was wrong to suggest that civilians were allowed to be members of the clubs.

"These areas are parks which include golf courses. Army men like to play golf. What's wrong with that? And these areas are very beautiful," spokesman Om Singh told the AFP news agency.

'Spectacular'

The report by the comptroller and auditor general described the army's management of its huge land holdings as dismal.

It found that at least 32 sq km (12 sq miles) of rent-free land had been handed to a privately-run company, Army Zone Golf, which operates 97 luxury golf courses.

Army Zone Golf claims to promote the sport in the armed services and runs "some of the most spectacular golf courses of India & Pakistan", according to its website.

The report said that golf memberships are being sold to serving and former service personnel as well as civilians and foreign nationals, with revenue credited to a private regimental fund which could not be accessed by the auditors.

It said that army authorities "earn large amounts of revenue by allowing persons other than service personnel to use these facilities".

"Heavy amounts of revenues were being earned without paying any lease rent and allied charges for use of government assets," it said.

The BBC's Mark Dummett in Delhi,Rpindi says that the report is likely to reinforce fears in India,Pakistan that corruption is spreading through even its most trusted public institutions.

Our correspondent says that Indian and Pakistani army officers have enjoyed their golf since colonial days - it is common for army camps to have their own courses and sports clubs. All prime land is with such clubs and entry to VVIP enclosure is restricted to serving generals and their families

 

=

Charley Reese final column - on DEBT, TAXES & POLITICIANS IN WASHINGTON




FYI - from Lance - interesting analysis.  I checked on SNOPES - http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/reese.asp  appears to be accurate - there are a couple of versions he wrote going around.  Charley Reese was a journalist for the Orlando Sentinel from 1971-2001 and wrote a syndicated column that went to newspapers all over the USA.
 
Andre
-----

 .

 

. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
545 People
By Charlie Reese
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


http://www.votetrackers.com/545-people.html

http://gulfshoreslife.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/545-people-by-charlie-reese/

 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2206329/posts

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

 

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

 

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

 

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

 

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall.. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

 

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

 

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

 

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red ..

If the Army &Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

 

There are no insoluble government problems..

 

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

 

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist
of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper
.


What you do with this article now that you have read it, is up to you.

This might be funny if it weren't so darned true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for peanuts
Anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.
Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.
Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.


TAXES:
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians?' And I still have to 'press 1' for English!?

 


CIA MUSKETEERS STUDYING LIBYA

DeYoung Miller Wash Post Mar 30 2011 In Libya, CIA is gathering intelligence on rebels


Gallery: Conflict and chaos in Libya: As international airstrikes continue against forces loyal to Moammar Gaddafi, rebels face difficult battle.

By Karen DeYoung and Greg Miller, Wednesday, March 30, 9:32 PM

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/in-libya-cia-is-gathering-intelligence-on-rebels/2011/03/30/AFLyb25B_story.html

The Obama administration has sent teams of CIA operatives into Libya in a rush to gather intelligence on the identities and capabilities of rebel forces opposed to Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi, according to U.S. officials.

Graphic

Follow how events are unfolding in Libya.

Graphic: Follow how events are unfolding in Libya.

Video

The CIA has sent small teams of operatives into Libya, and the White House said Wednesday it was assessing "all types of assistance" for rebels battling Moammar Gaddafi's troops. (March 31)

Video: The CIA has sent small teams of operatives into Libya, and the White House said Wednesday it was assessing "all types of assistance" for rebels battling Moammar Gaddafi's troops. (March 31)

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

The information has become more crucial as the administration and its coalition partners move closer to providing direct military aid or guidance to the disorganized and beleaguered rebel army.

Although the administration has pledged that no U.S. ground troops will be deployed to Libya, officials said Wednesday that President Obama has issued a secret finding that would authorize the CIA to carry out a clandestine effort to provide arms and other support to Libyan opposition groups.

The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, insisted that no decision has been made.

In the face of a new onslaught by government troops, rebel forces fled eastward Wednesday from cities and towns they had captured just days ago. But Gaddafi suffered a political defeat with the defection to Britain of his foreign minister, Musa Kusa, the most senior official to break ranks since the coalition bombing campaign began nearly two weeks ago.

House and Senate lawmakers briefed in a closed-door session by top administration officials, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, said they received a picture of mixed progress on the ground in Libya.

The headlong rebel retreat through the oil hubs of Ras Lanuf and Brega, en route to the strategic city of Ajdabiya, demonstrated the limits of their fighting ability against the superior firepower and military organization of Gaddafi loyalists. It also underscored how dependent the anti-Gaddafi forces have become on airstrikes and missile attacks by the Western-led coalition.

"Our volunteer forces in the front have only got light weapons and are facing a very large military might," said a rebel spokesman, Col. Ahmad Bani. The largely untrained and poorly organized force lacks anti-tank and other heavy weapons.

Bani called on NATO forces to intervene more forcefully, although a U.S. military official said coalition airstrikes, including attacks by U.S. AC-130 gunships, had continued apace in combat areas along the Libyan coast, with 32 U.S. and 23 coalition airstrikes in the 12-hour period through midday in Libya.

Administration officials said U.S. participation in the strikes would subside rapidly once NATO formally takes overall command this week of all aspects of the operation.

Officials said they saw Libyan government gains during the day as temporary and part of the "fluid" back and forth of the ground combat. But they did not dispute the likelihood that the rebels will need more equipment and training to prevail, increasing the pressure to find out more about the opposition.

Several lawmakers briefed by Clinton, Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said they were told that the United States is still trying to put together a full picture of the Libyan rebellion but believes that it does not contain large numbers of radical Islamic militants.

"Nobody had detected any significant presence, although they knew there were some people," said Rep. Gary L. Ackerman (D-N.Y.). But "nobody's vouching for resumes" at the moment, Ackerman said.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), said he heard nothing in the briefing that turned him in favor of arming the rebels. Calling it a "horrible idea," Rogers said: "We know what they're against. We don't really know what they're for."

A senior administration official said that "we know well" some of the more prominent members of the Transitional National Council, the group that has been the public face of the rebellion and that includes lawyers, intellectuals and former members of the Gaddafi government.

But "in terms of participants on the ground, that's a deeper dive, obviously," said the official, one of several interviewed who were not authorized to publicly discuss the administration's efforts. "You have the leadership and the formal structure, and then the ground truth in various parts of the country where you have strong opposition" to Gaddafi, but little is known about who is leading those efforts.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Wednesday that his government has made no decision about arming the rebels and that "we want to know about any links with al-Qaeda." But, he said, "given what we have seen" of the opposition political leaders, "I think it would be right to put the emphasis on the positive side."

The CIA's efforts represent a belated attempt to acquire basic information about rebel forces that had barely surfaced on the radar of U.S. spy agencies before the uprisings in North Africa.

Among the CIA's tasks is to assess whether rebel leaders could be reliable partners if the administration opts to begin funneling in money or arms.

Obama took a key step in that direction by issuing a secret authorization known as a presidential "finding," designed to pave the way for the flow of money or weapons. News of the finding, signed several weeks ago, was first reported Wednesday by Reuters.

Under law, the CIA requires special permission from the president to carry out activities designed to influence foreign events. A finding establishes a framework of legal authorities for specific covert activities, and in some cases for future actions that can be taken only after specific permission is given.

Such operations are fraught with risks. The CIA's history is replete with efforts that backfired against U.S. interests in unexpected ways. In perhaps the most fateful example, the CIA's backing of Islamic fighters in Afghanistan succeeded in driving out the Soviets in the 1980s, but it also presaged the emergence of militant groups, including al-Qaeda, that the United States is now struggling to contain.

Giving the CIA an expanded role in Libya would enable the administration to bridge the gap between the restrictions on coalition airstrikes and Obama's stated goal of bringing Gaddafi's four-decade rule to an end.

The CIA's Special Activities Division includes paramilitary operatives who could help guide rebel operations as well as allied airstrikes.

Even amid an escalating campaign of coalition airstrikes, opposition forces have repeatedly mounted ill-advised assaults on Gaddafi positions and have been forced to retreat from territory they had gained.

If CIA paramilitary operatives were linked up with rebel leaders, "we'd be providing the intelligence on the location of the bad guys and saying, 'Don't you realize they're just down the road here, and you're going to get whacked if you go too far?' " said a U.S. official with access to intelligence on the fighting in Libya. "These guys don't seem to be following any common-sense military advice."

White House press secretary Jay Carney refused to comment on "intelligence matters" and reiterated Obama's public statements that while no decision has been made about arming the rebels, "we're not ruling it out or ruling it in."

Officials emphasized that the U.S. military will have no role on the ground in assisting the rebels. "There is no planning for putting any U.S. boots on the ground" for any purpose, a U.S. military official said. "We have no mandate, no authority, no planning going on to that effect. . . . Nobody's told us to be prepared to do that."

deyoungk@washpost.com

millergreg@washpost.com

Staff writers David Fahrenthold in Washington and Tara Bahrampour in Benghazi and correspondent Liz Sly in Tripoli contributed to this report.

 

t-l�yae���fghanistan, and to be as significant a presence, as they are today. Some of the advisers contend that the counterinsurgency mission being conducted is far broader than what was envisaged by Obama when he authorized the surge.

An opening shot in that debate could play out over the next few weeks as the White House considers a request from Petraeus to expand the size of the Afghan army and police force from a total of 305,000 to 378,000.

Military officials contend that the Afghan government needs a larger security service to help stave off the Taliban and assume responsibility from coalition forces. But National Security Council officials have suggested that Afghanistan might not really require such a large army and police force, and that perhaps new village-defense squads could make up some of the difference. The officials also question whether there would be enough U.S. and NATO forces to mentor such a large Afghan force.

The most significant issue is the price tag. Increasing the Afghan security forces to 378,000 could cost as much as $8 billion a year. Much of that would have to be paid for by the United States.

"That's a huge bill," the senior official said. "In this fiscal environment, think of what we could do at home with $8 billion."

chandrasek@washpost.com

 



[1] The National Security Council (NSC) is the formal organization created to advise the president on national security policy. It was created immediately after World War II to consolidate national security advisers from the departments of State, Defense and the Treasury "so as to enable the military services and the other departments and agencies of the Government to cooperate more effectively in matters involving the national security."  In 1949, it was moved to the EOP. 



The NSC consists of the president, who is the chair, the vice president, the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the secretary of the treasury and the assistant to the president for national security affairs, also called the national security adviser. Other advisers, such as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the director of national intelligence, the president's chief of staff, the president's counsel and the assistant to the president for economic policy are invited to attend all NSC meetings. The attorney general, the OMB director, and the heads of other executive agencies are invited to pertinent meetings. 



The NSC's structure has changed drastically based on who is president. Some presidents have deferred to the State Department as the primary foreign policy voice while others have given that authority to the Defense Department, for instance. Shortly after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush created the Homeland Security Council as a contact point in the White House for all the agencies involved in homeland security. Obama changed the configuration of the executive branch's homeland security infrastructure. He merged the Homeland Security Council with the National Security Council as recommended by the 9/11 Commission. The Homeland Security Council is still in charge of policy issues regarding terrorism, natural disasters and pandemics, but it does so from under the umbrella of the NSC.  The Homeland Security Council is headed by Deputy National Security Advisor John O. Brennan. http://www.whorunsgov.com/Institutions/White_House/Offices/COS/NSC